Read the following statement about tourism development and the suggested courses of action, and then decide which course of action logically follows, assuming the statement is fully true. Statement: Huge amounts of resources are required to develop tourist places in a country like India, which is endowed with vast coastlines, rivers, forests, temples, and many other attractions. Courses of action: a. More tourist resorts should be started along the coastlines only. b. The tourist potential of India should be systematically exploited.

Introduction / Context:
This course of action question discusses the development of tourist places in India, a country with diverse natural and cultural attractions. The statement highlights the need for huge resources to develop tourism. You must determine which of the proposed actions is a logical and balanced response to this observation. The question checks whether you can distinguish between narrow and comprehensive strategies.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• India has vast coastlines, rivers, forests, temples, and other attractions.
• Developing tourist places in such a country requires huge amounts of resources.
• The statement suggests a large, varied tourism potential.
• There is interest in planning how to develop this potential.

Concept / Approach:
A logical course of action must:

• Address the overall potential mentioned in the statement.
• Be inclusive and balanced rather than arbitrarily narrow.
• Help utilise resources efficiently across different types of attractions.

We compare both proposed courses using these criteria.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Evaluate course of action a. It recommends starting more tourist resorts along the coastlines only. However, the statement clearly notes that India also has rivers, forests, temples, and other attractions. Focusing only on coastlines ignores many other important tourist assets. Therefore, a is too narrow and not a logical direct response to the broad potential described. Step 2: Evaluate course of action b. It suggests that the tourist potential of India should be exploited. This matches the idea that India has diverse attractions and that resources can be used to develop tourism systematically across these different areas. It is broad, flexible, and directly aligned with the statement. Step 3: Decide which course follows. Since a restricts development to coastlines despite a wide variety of attractions, it does not fully respect the statement. In contrast, b clearly follows as a natural conclusion that India should take advantage of its tourism potential. Step 4: Choose the correct option. Only b follows is the appropriate answer.

Verification / Alternative check:
Consider how a national tourism policy would be designed in light of the given statement. It would likely aim to develop beaches, rivers, forests, heritage sites, temples, and more, rather than concentrating solely on coastlines. Course of action b leaves room for all these possibilities, while a restricts development to only one type of attraction. This confirms that b alone follows logically.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Only a follows: Incorrect because it focuses only on coastlines and ignores the broader set of attractions mentioned.
• Both a and b follow: Incorrect because a is not consistent with a balanced exploitation of overall tourist potential.
• Neither a nor b follows: Incorrect because b is a valid and natural conclusion.

Common Pitfalls:
Some students may think that since coastlines are attractive, focusing on them is always a good idea. However, course of action questions require alignment with the entire statement, not just part of it. Another pitfall is to treat the word exploit as negative, but in this context it simply means to use the tourist potential in a planned and beneficial way.

Final Answer:
Only b follows.