An expert group on technical education has stressed that computer education should be provided to children from primary school onward and that this implementation should take place simultaneously in both urban and rural schools. In this course of action logical reasoning question, which proposed actions should the government and schools follow to introduce computer education effectively and fairly?

Introduction / Context:
This question focuses on policy related course of action in the field of education. An expert group on technical education has recommended that computer education be introduced from the primary school stage in both urban and rural areas. The issue is how to translate this recommendation into practical steps. We must judge whether issuing instructions to all schools and training at least one teacher in each school are appropriate and necessary actions that logically follow from the recommendation.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Experts on technical education recommend that computer education begin at the primary level.
• This recommendation applies to both urban and rural schools and should be implemented simultaneously.
• Course of action a: The government should issue instructions to all schools to provide computer education.
• Course of action b: At least one teacher in each school should be trained in computer operations to teach children.
• We assume that computer education requires infrastructure, trained staff, and policy support.

Concept / Approach:
To judge a course of action, we check whether it is relevant, practical, and directed toward implementing the goal described in the statement. For a policy recommendation in education, authorities must first formalize the policy and then ensure that schools have the capacity to carry it out, which includes trained teachers. Both systemic instructions and capacity building are usually essential. Any action that ignores these basic requirements is incomplete.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Understand the recommendation. Computer education needs to be incorporated from primary classes in both rural and urban schools.Step 2: Evaluate course of action a. For any nationwide educational change, the government has to issue clear instructions, guidelines, or directives to all schools. Without formal instructions, implementation will be uneven or absent. Hence, course a is directly linked to executing the recommendation.Step 3: Evaluate course of action b. Computer education requires teachers who can operate computers and teach children effectively. Training at least one teacher in each school is a minimum requirement to start classes. This ensures that the new subject is not introduced only on paper but can actually be taught.Step 4: Check for consistency with the aim of simultaneous implementation in urban and rural schools. Both actions help all schools move together: instructions set the policy and training ensures that both rural and urban schools have basic staff capacity.Step 5: Conclude that both course of action a and course of action b logically follow from the statement.

Verification / Alternative check:
Think practically about the rollout of a new subject. The sequence usually is: policy decision, formal communication to institutions, teacher training, provision of equipment, and monitoring. Course a corresponds to formal communication. Course b corresponds to teacher training. If either step is missing, the programme will fall short. Therefore, both courses are not only reasonable but almost essential for successful execution of the expert recommendation.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Option b (Only a follows) is wrong because simply issuing instructions without trained teachers leads to poor quality implementation.
• Option c (Only b follows) is wrong because training teachers without any official instruction or policy mandate will not scale across all schools.
• Option d (Neither a nor b follows) is clearly incorrect since both actions directly support the stated goal.
• Option e (None of these) is wrong because there is a specific correct combination, namely both a and b.

Common Pitfalls:
Candidates sometimes assume that issuing instructions alone is enough, forget that implementation requires trained staff, or think that training one teacher is not sufficient. In reasoning questions, we treat each course as a broad policy direction rather than a detailed implementation plan. Another common confusion is to treat course b as optional. In reality, without trained teachers, the recommendation will remain symbolic in rural and urban schools alike.

Final Answer:
Both courses of action a and b follow.