The appearance of China made globes in Canada that show Jammu and Kashmir as not being a part of India has alarmed the Indian diaspora living there. In this course of action logical reasoning question, which of the following responses should logically be taken in reaction to these inaccurate globes?

Introduction / Context:
This question tests course of action reasoning in an international and diplomatic context. China made globes sold in Canada show Jammu and Kashmir as not being part of India. This has naturally alarmed the Indian diaspora there. Three courses of action are offered: lodging a complaint against the manufacturers, demanding an official apology from the Chinese government, and calling for a complete boycott of Chinese products in Canada. We must decide which response logically follows as a reasonable reaction to the inaccurate representation.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• China made globes sold in Canada depict Jammu and Kashmir as not part of India.
• The Indian diaspora in Canada is alarmed by this misrepresentation.
• Course of action I: The Indian diaspora should lodge a complaint against the manufacturers for giving out inaccurate information.
• Course of action II: The Chinese government should issue an official apology to Indians.
• Course of action III: Canadian people should stop buying Chinese products altogether.
• We assume that the issue arises from how the product is designed, labelled, or approved.

Concept / Approach:
A sound course of action must be practical, proportionate, and directly connected to the problem. Lodging a complaint with the manufacturers or concerned authorities is a reasonable first step. Demanding a government level apology or calling for a complete boycott are far more extreme measures, especially when the statement does not clarify who approved the map content. Logical reasoning tasks usually favour measured, direct responses before diplomatic or economic escalations.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Examine course of action I. Lodging a complaint against the manufacturers or distributors is a direct way to highlight the inaccuracy and request correction. It is practical and proportionate.Step 2: Consider who can address packaging and map design. Manufacturers, importers, and regulatory bodies can change the globe representation or label it correctly upon receiving complaints.Step 3: Examine course of action II. Demanding an official apology from the Chinese government involves diplomatic channels and assumes direct intentional policy behind the specific product representation, which is not established by the statement.Step 4: Examine course of action III. Asking the entire Canadian population to stop buying Chinese products is an extreme economic step far beyond the problem of globe mislabelling. It is not a proportionate first response.Step 5: Conclude that only course of action I logically follows, as it is the most appropriate and direct way to address the inaccurate information.

Verification / Alternative check:
Reasonable escalation in such issues typically starts with complaints to companies, retailers, or consumer protection bodies. If those fail, further diplomatic or trade measures may be considered. However, the question asks what should be done based on the single piece of information given, not after many failed attempts. As such, lodging a complaint is the step that clearly and directly follows from the situation, while the other actions are disproportionate and not logically compelled by the statement.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Option b (Only course of action II follows) is wrong because the statement does not justify immediate demand for an official state level apology.
• Option c (Both I and II follow) is wrong as it combines a reasonable step with an unnecessary escalation.
• Option d (Both II and III follow) is wrong because both actions are too extreme and not grounded in the limited information given.
• Option e (None of these) is wrong since course of action I is clearly suitable.

Common Pitfalls:
Students sometimes choose extreme retaliatory measures, thinking that they show patriotic firmness. In logical reasoning questions, however, the focus is on what is rational and justified by the given facts. Another pitfall is to treat every product related issue as a direct act of a government, which need not always be the case. Understanding proportional response is crucial in course of action problems.

Final Answer:
Only course of action I follows.