Statement: The state administration banned the gathering of more than fifty people at any place during the visit of foreign dignitaries to the city. Assumptions: I. People may avoid gathering at any place in the city during the period of the visit of.

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This problem tests the core idea behind “statement and assumption” questions in verbal reasoning. An assumption is something that is taken for granted by the author/actor of the statement and must hold for the action or decision to make sense. Here, the state administration has imposed a temporary restriction on large gatherings during a dignitary visit. We must identify which assumption(s) the administration necessarily relies upon for this step to achieve its intended purpose (public order and security). Given Data / Assumptions: Action: A ban on gatherings of more than fifty people at any place. Occasion: Visit of foreign dignitaries to the city. Assumption I: People may avoid gathering during the visit if a ban exists. Assumption II: Many people may ignore the ban and still gather to get a glimpse. Concept / Approach:The government imposes restrictions expecting compliance sufficient to reduce risk. For an action to be rational, it must be guided by a belief that people, by and large, will obey. A belief that “many will ignore” is not a necessary precondition; rather it undermines the purpose if taken as the primary belief. Step-by-Step Solution: 1) Identify the purpose of the ban: maintain security and order during a sensitive visit.2) Ask: What must be true for the ban to help? That people, generally, will comply and avoid forming large gatherings.3) Evaluate Assumption I: If people avoid gathering because of the ban, the ban can work. This aligns with the necessary belief.4) Evaluate Assumption II: The statement does not need the authority to assume “many” will defy the order; assuming mass disobedience is not required for imposing the ban. Verification / Alternative check:If most people did not comply, the ban would fail its purpose. Hence, a minimal compliance expectation is essential. Nothing in the statement requires assuming a widespread violation. Why Other Options Are Wrong: • Only Assumption II: Not required; it contradicts the rationale.• Either I or II: The action needs I; II is not necessary.• Neither I nor II: I is necessary.• Both I and II: II is not needed. Common Pitfalls:Confusing possible outcomes (some may defy) with necessary beliefs. Also, reading “any place” as “zero gatherings whatsoever” is too literal; the ban targets large gatherings, and compliance in spirit is the point. Final Answer:Only Assumption I is implicit.

More Questions from Statement and Assumption

Discussion & Comments