Longitudinal gradient interpretation: Three points A, B, and C, 500 m apart on a straight road, have reduced levels 500 m, 505 m, and 510 m respectively. What does this indicate about the gradient between A and C?
-
ANo gradient between A and C
-
BA positive gradient between A and C
-
CA negative gradient between A and C
-
DA negative gradient between A and B
-
EA positive gradient between A and B followed by a negative gradient between B and C
Answer
Correct Answer: A positive gradient between A and C
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Reduced levels (RLs) are elevations above a datum. Longitudinal profiles use RLs to determine up- or down-grades. Understanding the sign and magnitude of gradient is crucial for drainage, fuel economy, and safety.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- A, B, C are collinear along the road at equal spacing of 500 m.
- RL(A) = 500 m, RL(B) = 505 m, RL(C) = 510 m.
- Chainage increases from A → B → C.
Concept / Approach:
If the RL increases with chainage, the road climbs: that is a positive gradient. Here, elevation increases by 5 m every 500 m, indicating a uniform ascending grade between A and C.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Compute grade A→B = (505 − 500)/500 = 5/500 = 1.0% (up).Compute grade B→C = (510 − 505)/500 = 5/500 = 1.0% (up).Overall A→C = (510 − 500)/1000 = 10/1000 = 1.0% (up).Verification / Alternative check:
Graphing RL versus chainage shows a straight rising line; no change in sign occurs between segments.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- No gradient: false; RL clearly changes.
- Negative gradient: RL decreases with chainage would be required; opposite is observed.
- Mixed gradients: both segments are uniformly rising, not mixed.
Common Pitfalls:
- Confusing positive/negative gradient sign conventions with slope direction on plots.
Final Answer:
A positive gradient between A and C.