Before full-scale implementation, what should a study project proposal for an MIS initiative primarily recommend?

Introduction / Context:
A study project proposal (also called pre-feasibility or concept paper) precedes major investment in a Management Information System (MIS). Its role is to justify whether a comprehensive feasibility study should be funded—before committing to design or implementation decisions.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The organization has identified a need or opportunity.
• Management requires a modest, initial proposal to decide on deeper analysis.
• Detailed designs and implementation commitments are premature at this stage.

Concept / Approach:
The proposal articulates objectives, scope boundaries, expected benefits, risks, and the cost of conducting the feasibility study. It should recommend further feasibility analysis, not lock in a specific design or declare immediate implementation. This staged approach reduces risk and prevents sunk-cost bias.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Stage-gate and PMBOK practices require a concept/business case to greenlight a feasibility phase; only later stages recommend specific designs or commence implementation.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Recommending a particular design or immediate implementation preempts due diligence; “All of the above” conflates sequential stages; “None” is incorrect because recommending feasibility is exactly the purpose now.

Common Pitfalls:
Over-specifying solutions too early; underestimating feasibility study scope and data-collection needs; ignoring change management and governance considerations.

Final Answer:
recommends further study of MIS feasibility