Structured design methodology: which statement best captures the principles this approach adheres to?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: top-down refinement and data-flow analysis are emphasized

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Structured design emerged to manage complexity by decomposing systems into well-defined modules with clear interfaces. It emphasizes disciplined analysis prior to coding and employs standardized notations to reduce ambiguity. Understanding its guiding principles helps distinguish it from other approaches such as bottom-up design or ad hoc prototyping without formal artifacts.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Structured design promotes clarity, cohesion, low coupling, and correctness before implementation.
  • Common tools include data-flow diagrams (DFDs), structure charts, and decision tables.
  • Top-down refinement—progressively detailing from abstract to concrete—is central.


Concept / Approach:
The method starts with requirements, models processes and data movement with DFDs, and refines into modules via top-down design. The aim is to isolate responsibilities, define inputs/outputs precisely, and minimize inter-module dependencies. While bottom-up can be useful for component reuse, the hallmark of structured design is the dominance of top-down refinement coupled with rigorous analysis artifacts that drive an unambiguous specification.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify principles associated with structured design: top-down, modularity, data-flow analysis. Compare with alternatives: bottom-up alone is not the primary structured principle; ad hoc narratives/prototyping without analysis are insufficient. Select the option that explicitly states top-down refinement and data-flow analysis. Confirm that this aligns with classic structured methods.


Verification / Alternative check:
Foundational texts (e.g., Yourdon/DeMarco) emphasize DFDs, structured charts, and refinement, supporting the selected statement as representative of structured design.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Bottom-up design: can complement but is not the defining principle here.
  • Only rapid prototyping: useful in iterative methods, but structured design requires formal analysis.
  • Informal narratives: contradict the method’s emphasis on standardized diagrams.
  • None: incorrect because a correct description is provided.


Common Pitfalls:
Equating structured methods with heavy documentation; the goal is clarity and testability, not paperwork for its own sake.


Final Answer:
top-down refinement and data-flow analysis are emphasized

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion