Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Parallel run
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
When replacing an information system, organizations choose a conversion strategy balancing risk, cost, and speed. Common approaches include direct cutover, phased conversion, pilot conversion, and parallel run. Understanding the operational implications of each strategy helps managers plan staffing, data reconciliation, and risk mitigation during go-live periods.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Parallel run operates both systems concurrently for a defined period. Transactions are entered into both, and results are compared. Discrepancies prompt investigation and correction until confidence is achieved. While costly in labor and potentially duplicative, parallel running reduces risk because the legacy system remains a fallback if the new system fails to meet requirements. By contrast, “multiprocessing” and “multitasking” are technical execution modes on a computer, not conversion strategies.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Project management and SDLC references list parallel run as a standard conversion option alongside pilot, phased, and direct cutover, confirming terminology and practice.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Underestimating the effort to maintain data consistency across both systems during parallel periods; plan reconciliation procedures and clear cutover criteria.
Final Answer:
Parallel run
Discussion & Comments