Statement: Should there be an amendment in the acts related to check-bouncing? Arguments: I. Yes, Existing laws are not sufficient in curbing the incidents related to check-bouncing. II. Yes. This will lessen the miseries of entrepreneurs due to increase in number of incidents of delay in payment and problems related to check-bouncing.
Verbal Reasoning
Statement and Argument
Choose an option
-
Aif only argument I is strong
-
Bif only argument II is strong
-
Cif either I or II is strong
-
Dif neither I nor II is strong
Answer
Correct Answer: if only argument II is strong
Explanation
I is weak because ''amendment'' itself implies that the existing laws are not sufficient. There is no addition to what has been said in the statement. II is strong because the miseries of the entrepreneurs are certainly not desirable.