Statement–Argument — Is “Each one teach one” the best policy to spread elementary education in India? Arguments: I. Yes. If 60% literates teach 40% illiterates, universal coverage becomes plausible with minimal additional infrastructure. II. No. People are too time-pressed and focus on livelihood, so they cannot contribute.

Introduction / Context:
The slogan proposes peer-driven literacy expansion to accelerate foundational learning, complementing formal schemes.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Large literate base exists that can tutor basic skills.
• Community models reduce marginal costs and expand reach.
• Participation can be flexible (evenings, weekends).

Concept / Approach:
Argument strength hinges on feasibility and alignment with enrolment/retention goals. Practical constraints should be weighed against scalable volunteerism and civic duty initiatives.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) I: Presents a simple, scalable arithmetic of coverage and a plausible community-based mechanism—strong.2) II: Over-generalises that people lack time; ignores partial participation, incentives, and institutional support—weak.

Verification / Alternative check:
Adult literacy drives and volunteer tutoring have repeatedly shown adjunct value alongside formal schooling.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They inflate a defeatist assumption over a workable, supplementing strategy.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming participation must be universal to be effective.

Final Answer:
if only argument I is strong.