Statement–Argument — Should all universities be allowed to operate educational FM radio? Arguments: I. No. Universities might drift towards commercial use, undermining academic objectives. II. Yes. It will reduce the urban–rural information gap and widen access to education.

Introduction / Context:Campus/community radio can disseminate lectures, career guidance, and local development content, complementing formal instruction.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Universities serve public-interest educational goals.
• Regulatory licences can impose non-commercial conditions and oversight.
• Rural outreach remains a key equity challenge.

Concept / Approach:A strong argument should be realistic and policy-addressable. Potential misuse (I) is speculative and mitigable via licensing terms, audits, and penalties. The access benefit (II) is concrete and aligns with education policy.

Step-by-Step Solution:1) I identifies a risk but offers no reason why regulation cannot prevent it—weak.2) II articulates a direct benefit—bridging gaps and improving reach—strong.

Verification / Alternative check:Community radio frameworks commonly cap advertising and mandate educational content, addressing I while enabling II.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:They undervalue the feasibility of regulating away commercial drift and the clear educational upside.

Common Pitfalls:Letting speculative misuse outweigh implementable safeguards.

Final Answer:if only argument II is strong.