Critical Reasoning – Foreign policy alignment Statement: Should India support all international policies of the United States of America? Arguments: I. No. Many other powerful countries do not support those policies. II. Yes. This is the only way to gain access to USA developmental funds.

Introduction / Context:
Foreign policy decisions should be based on national interest, strategic fit, and principles—not popularity or one-dimensional funding motives. We judge each argument’s validity against these standards.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• No specific policy is cited; it is about supporting “all” policies wholesale.
• International alignment depends on nuanced cost-benefit and values.
• Funding access should not be the sole determinant.

Concept / Approach:
Appeals to popularity (“others do/do not support”) and “only way” funding arguments are logical fallacies (bandwagon, false dilemma). Strong arguments should emphasize independent interest and policy merits.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
If we replaced USA with any nation, wholesale support would remain questionable; selective, interest-based cooperation is the rational standard, which neither argument articulates.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Any option granting strength to I or II misreads their logical weaknesses.

Common Pitfalls:
Accepting bandwagon logic; assuming binary choices in diplomacy.

Final Answer:
Neither I nor II is strong