Agricultural inputs – Should genetically modified (GM) imported seeds be completely banned? Arguments to evaluate: I. Yes, banning imports will boost demand for domestically developed seeds. II. No, importing GM seeds is the only way to increase.

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:We evaluate whether a complete ban on imported GM seeds is justified. Strong arguments must be directly relevant and reasonably supported; extreme claims without support are weak. Given Data / Assumptions: Policy: a total ban on GM seed imports. Domestic seed sector exists and could be stimulated by protection. There are concerns (rightly or wrongly) about consumer health impacts from GM produce. Concept / Approach:Two distinct policy logics can be strong: strategic industrial policy (I) and precautionary public-health reasoning (III). A claim that imports are the “only way” to raise output (II) is absolutist and weak. Step-by-Step Solution: I: Strong as an industrial-policy argument. A ban can shift demand toward domestic R&D and varieties, fostering capability.II: Weak. Productivity can rise through non-GM hybrids, agronomy, irrigation, mechanization, and better logistics; “only way” is over-claimed.III: Potentially strong under the precautionary principle; if adverse health effects are a credible risk, a ban (or strict regulation) is justified. Verification / Alternative check: Countries vary in GM policies; some prefer strict approval regimes or bans based on risk assessments and domestic-industry goals. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any choice endorsing II treats an absolute as fact; “All are strong” overstates II. Common Pitfalls: Assuming a single path to higher yields; ignoring industrial-policy or health-risk frameworks. Final Answer:Only I and III are strong

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Discussion & Comments