Policy reasoning – Should education be compulsory for all children up to age 14? Arguments to evaluate: I. Yes, it will help eradicate forced child employment. II. Yes, it is an effective way to make the entire population educated. III. No, there is inadequate infrastructure to educate everyone. IV. Yes, it would raise the standard of living.

Introduction / Context:The question asks which arguments strongly support compulsory education up to age 14. Strong arguments are those that are relevant, logical, and consequential for the stated policy goal.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Policy: compulsory schooling through age 14.
• Goals commonly include reducing child labour, building human capital, and improving social indicators.
• Resource constraints may exist but do not automatically invalidate the policy objective.

Concept / Approach:We evaluate each argument on relevance and sufficiency, avoiding defeatism (“we lack infrastructure”) as a reason to reject a foundational policy. Implementation challenges typically call for phased rollouts, not policy abandonment.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:

Final Answer:Only I, II and IV are strong