Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Only I and II are implicit
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The government launches facilitation counters for foreign tourists, staffed by trained personnel. The rationale and feasibility depend on certain background beliefs about staffing and expected benefits.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Step-by-Step Solution:
I is necessary: Without adequate trained staff, “manned by trained staff” cannot be realized sustainably.II is necessary: The policy presumes beneficial impact on tourism (improved satisfaction leading to higher inflow).III is too strong: Even if many (but not a majority) need services, the counters remain justified. Thus III is not required.Verification / Alternative check:
Rejecting I or II renders the initiative infeasible or purposeless. Rejecting III leaves the initiative intact because “majority” is not essential.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only III ignores feasibility and purpose; II and III exaggerates demand; All includes an unnecessary majority claim; None ignores I and II.Common Pitfalls:
Confusing “significant” with “majority”; policies can serve large minorities effectively.Final Answer:
Only I and II are implicit
Discussion & Comments