Introduction / Context:
This is a causal-dependence statement: prosperity depends on human-resource quality. We must test whether the claim requires measurability of quality or universal desire for prosperity.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Claim: Prosperity depends on human-resource quality.
- Assumption I: Human-resource quality must be measurable.
- Assumption II: Every nation cherishes prosperity as a goal.
Concept / Approach:
- A causal relation can be asserted without requiring formal measurability; dependence can exist even if measurement is imperfect or qualitative.
- The statement is descriptive, not prescriptive; it states what prosperity depends on, not whether nations want prosperity.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assumption I: Not necessary. One can state that X depends on Y without having a precise metric for Y; measurability is useful but not logically required to make the dependency true.Assumption II: Not necessary. The truth of the dependency is independent of whether all nations choose to pursue prosperity.
Verification / Alternative check:
Remove I and II: The core causal statement remains intact and meaningful.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Choosing I, II, Either, or Both introduces extra claims (measurement or universal goals) that are not required by the dependency claim.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming that because something matters, it must be measured; confusing a descriptive claim with a value judgment about goals.
Final Answer:
Neither I nor II is implicit
Discussion & Comments