Critical Reasoning — Implicit Assumptions Instructional sequence: “If Rajan has finished reading the instructions, then let him begin the activities accordingly.” Assumptions to test: I. Rajan would understand the instructions. II. Rajan is capable of performing the activities.

Introduction / Context:
The directive links completion of reading instructions to starting activities. We must find the background beliefs needed for this sequence to be reasonable.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Conditional action: after reading, begin activities.
• Assumption I: comprehension of instructions.
• Assumption II: capability to perform the activities as instructed.

Concept / Approach:
An action triggered by “finished reading” presumes both understanding and ability; otherwise, starting immediately would be unsafe or pointless.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Negate either I or II and the sequencing instruction becomes questionable or unsafe. Therefore both assumptions are necessary.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Any option omitting one assumption ignores either the need for comprehension or the need for practical ability.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating finishing reading with understanding—these are different; the instruction presumes both understanding and competence.

Final Answer:
Both I and II are implicit