Critical Reasoning — Assumptions Statement from a Pensioners' Forum: “Two months ago, the Central Government announced dearness relief with immediate effect, but till date banks have not credited the arrears.” Assumptions to evaluate: I. Most banks.

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:The forum complains about a delay despite an “immediate effect” announcement. The implicit belief needed is that the elapsed time should have sufficed for implementation; the complaint does not rely on any general praise or criticism of banks’ usual care. Given Data / Assumptions: Fact claimed: Two months have passed with no arrears credited. Assumption I: Most banks normally care well for pensioners. Assumption II: Two months is enough to operationalize the payout after such an announcement. Concept / Approach: A grievance about delay presupposes a benchmark of reasonable implementation time. The complaint does not require any characterization of banks’ routine behavior toward pensioners. Step-by-Step Solution: Assumption II is necessary: Without believing two months is adequate for processing, the grievance would lack force.Assumption I is irrelevant to the argument; the point is the current failure relative to an urgent directive, not banks’ general care level. Verification / Alternative check: Drop II: The complaint weakens because the delay might be reasonable. Drop I: The complaint remains intact. Why Other Options Are Wrong: I, Either, Neither, Both misidentify what the delay-based argument depends on. Common Pitfalls: Confusing a specific procedural delay critique with a broad evaluation of service quality. Final Answer: Only assumption II is implicit

More Questions from Statement and Assumption

Discussion & Comments