Critical Reasoning — Assumptions Advertisement: “Our shoes are for the rich.” Assumptions to evaluate: I. Many people like to be labelled as rich (aspirational appeal exists). II. One cannot become rich unless one owns this brand of shoes.
Verbal Reasoning
Statement and Assumption
Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
-
AOnly assumption I is implicit
-
BOnly assumption II is implicit
-
CEither I or II is implicit
-
DNeither I nor II is implicit
-
EBoth I and II are implicit
Answer
Correct Answer: Only assumption I is implicit
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Advertising often relies on aspirational identity. By positioning a product as “for the rich,” the ad attempts to attract buyers who desire that identity or status association.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Message: The shoes are positioned for rich people.
- Assumption I: Consumers value being seen as rich; status labelling can influence purchase.
- Assumption II: Owning these shoes is a necessary condition to become rich (an absurd, unnecessary claim).
Concept / Approach:
- Effective positioning assumes a relevant consumer motive—in this case, aspirational status.
- The ad does not imply causal wealth creation through ownership; it merely associates the product with a segment/status.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assumption I underpins the appeal: without an audience that values the “rich” label, the positioning would not persuade.Assumption II is neither suggested nor required; wealth status is not claimed to be caused by buying shoes.Verification / Alternative check:
Drop I: The message loses persuasive power. Drop II: The message remains fully coherent—status association does not require wealth causation.Why Other Options Are Wrong:
II / Either / Neither / Both introduce an illogical requirement or ignore the role of status aspiration in marketing.Common Pitfalls:
Confusing symbolic association with literal, causal claims about wealth.Final Answer:
Only assumption I is implicit