Which Indian state decided to set up a dedicated anti poaching tiger protection force to safeguard its tiger population?

Introduction / Context:
This question relates to wildlife conservation measures taken by Indian states, particularly to protect tigers. Poaching and habitat loss are major threats to tiger populations, and authorities have created special units and forces to combat these problems. A newsworthy step was the decision by a particular state to set up an anti poaching tiger protection force. Competitive exams often ask which state took such initiatives, especially for iconic species like the tiger.

Given Data / Assumptions:
- The question is about a state government decision to set up an anti poaching tiger protection force.
- The options list four states: Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Telangana, and Haryana.
- We assume the question refers to a specific, widely reported decision connected with tiger reserves and wildlife sanctuaries in that state.

Concept / Approach:
The concept here is environmental and wildlife related current affairs. Telangana, a relatively new state, has important forest areas and tiger habitats. The approach is to recall which state was mentioned in news reports as having decided to form a specialised anti poaching tiger protection force, and to match that state with the options.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall from current affairs that a state government announced an anti poaching tiger protection force as part of its wildlife conservation efforts. Step 2: Connect that news with Telangana, which has tiger reserves and has shown interest in strengthening wildlife protection machinery. Step 3: Look at the options and identify Telangana as option C. Step 4: Consider that while Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh also have tiger reserves, the specific headline about setting up such a force at that time was associated with Telangana. Step 5: Conclude that Telangana is the correct answer.

Verification / Alternative check:
Reports in competitive exam oriented current affairs sources and environmental news outlets highlighted that Telangana decided to create an anti poaching tiger protection force to reduce illegal hunting and better protect its tiger habitats. Such reports did not attribute the same specific decision, with the same title, to the other states in this set of options for that period, confirming that this decision is correctly linked with Telangana.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Andhra Pradesh: While Andhra Pradesh also has forest areas and wildlife conservation programmes, the particular news about a new anti poaching tiger protection force was not associated with it in the period this question refers to.
Karnataka: Karnataka has major tiger reserves like Bandipur and Nagarhole and already has various protection mechanisms, but the decision described in this question, under that specific name, was reported for Telangana, not Karnataka.
Haryana: Haryana does not have significant tiger populations or large tiger reserves, making it unlikely to be the state in this specific context, so this option is clearly incorrect.

Common Pitfalls:
A frequent mistake is to select Karnataka simply because it is famous for tiger reserves and wildlife tourism, even when the question points to a newer announcement in another state. Another pitfall is to guess randomly among southern states without linking to actual news. To avoid such errors, it is important to actively revise wildlife and environment related news, particularly about tiger reserves, conservation projects, and new protection forces.

Final Answer:
The state that decided to set up an anti poaching tiger protection force is Telangana.