Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 6
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question tests pattern recognition in a custom operator. The symbol % here does not mean the usual remainder. Instead, it follows a rule that can be inferred from the given examples, typically involving digit sums or simple number properties.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
A common coding-decoding approach is to compare the inputs with the output and test simple operations like digit-sum difference. We verify the rule on both examples before applying it to the new case.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Check 45 % 11 = 7.
Digit sum of 45 = 4 + 5 = 9.
Digit sum of 11 = 1 + 1 = 2.
Difference = 9 - 2 = 7. Matches the result.
Now verify with 59 % 34 = 7.
Digit sum of 59 = 5 + 9 = 14.
Digit sum of 34 = 3 + 4 = 7.
Difference = 14 - 7 = 7. Matches again.
So the rule is: a % b = (sum of digits of a) - (sum of digits of b).
Now compute 55 % 4:
Digit sum of 55 = 5 + 5 = 10.
Digit sum of 4 = 4.
Result = 10 - 4 = 6.
Verification / Alternative check:
The rule is validated by both examples, so applying it to 55 and 4 is logically consistent. The computed result 6 fits the same operation pattern.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
7: would imply no subtraction of digit sum for 4.
5: could come from taking 10 - 5 by mistake.
10: ignoring the second number completely.
4: using digit sum of only the first number incorrectly.
Common Pitfalls:
Using the normal modulo meaning, subtracting the numbers directly (55 - 4), or taking digit product instead of digit sum are frequent errors.
Final Answer:
6
Discussion & Comments