The following equation is incorrect due to two operator signs being placed wrongly. Which two signs should be interchanged (swapped wherever they appear) to make the equation correct? 18 - 2 ÷ 20 + 5 x 16 = 69

Difficulty: Hard

Correct Answer: ÷ and -

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This question tests operator-interchange correction. You must identify which two operators, when swapped throughout the expression, make the left-hand side equal the right-hand side. The challenge is systematic checking while respecting arithmetic precedence.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Equation: 18 - 2 ÷ 20 + 5 x 16 = 69
  • Exactly two operator signs must be interchanged.
  • After swapping, evaluate using standard precedence: division and multiplication before addition and subtraction.


Concept / Approach:
Try each suggested pair-swap by replacing every occurrence of the first sign with the second and vice versa. Then compute the new left-hand side. The correct swap is the one that yields 69.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Test option: swap ÷ and -. Original: 18 - 2 ÷ 20 + 5 x 16 After swapping ÷ and -: 18 ÷ 2 - 20 + 5 x 16 Now evaluate: 18 ÷ 2 = 9 5 x 16 = 80 So LHS = 9 - 20 + 80 9 - 20 = -11 -11 + 80 = 69 This matches RHS = 69.


Verification / Alternative check:
Because the final computed value matches exactly, no further swaps are required. Also, the structure is sensible: a clean division at the start, then addition of a large product, which naturally can reach 69.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
+ and x: changes only one multiplication location and typically produces non-69 values. + and ÷: creates multiple divisions/additions that shift the result far from 69. - and +: mostly rearranges plus/minus but keeps 2 ÷ 20 small, not enough adjustment. x and ÷: disrupts the big 5 x 16 term, making it hard to reach 69.


Common Pitfalls:
Swapping only one occurrence of a sign, ignoring precedence, or doing swaps mentally without rewriting often leads to wrong conclusions.


Final Answer:
÷ and -

More Questions from Coding Decoding

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion