Statement & Argument — Should the Ministry of Defence raise the monthly liquor quota? Arguments: I. Yes, troops will do anything if promised liquor and leave. II. No, excessive alcohol consumption causes medical harm and dependency.
-
Aif only argument I is strong
-
Bif only argument II is strong
-
Cif either I or II is strong
-
Dif neither I nor II is strong; and
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: if only argument II is strong
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Policy toward service personnel must balance morale with health and operational readiness. Arguments using stereotypes or exaggeration are weak.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Excess alcohol has well-documented health and performance risks.
- Operational forces require fitness, judgment, and discipline.
- Motivation factors are multifaceted; reducing them to liquor and leave is reductive.
Concept / Approach:Arguments are strong when they reference credible outcomes that the policy should prioritize (health, readiness). They are weak when based on sweeping generalizations.
Step-by-Step Solution:1) Argument I: Overgeneralized and disrespectful in tone; not tied to evidence. Weak.2) Argument II: Cites medical and dependency risks relevant to forces. Strong.
Verification / Alternative check:Policies often restrict or monitor alcohol to protect health and readiness; this aligns with II.
Final Answer:Only Argument II is strong.