Statement & Argument — Should the Ministry of Defence raise the monthly liquor quota? Arguments: I. Yes, troops will do anything if promised liquor and leave. II. No, excessive alcohol consumption causes medical harm and dependency.

Introduction / Context:
Policy toward service personnel must balance morale with health and operational readiness. Arguments using stereotypes or exaggeration are weak.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Excess alcohol has well-documented health and performance risks.
• Operational forces require fitness, judgment, and discipline.
• Motivation factors are multifaceted; reducing them to liquor and leave is reductive.

Concept / Approach:
Arguments are strong when they reference credible outcomes that the policy should prioritize (health, readiness). They are weak when based on sweeping generalizations.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Argument I: Overgeneralized and disrespectful in tone; not tied to evidence. Weak.2) Argument II: Cites medical and dependency risks relevant to forces. Strong.

Verification / Alternative check:
Policies often restrict or monitor alcohol to protect health and readiness; this aligns with II.

Final Answer:
Only Argument II is strong.