More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement & Argument — Should commercial activity be permitted in residential areas? Arguments: I. No, it impairs healthy development and living conditions of residents. II. Yes, it contributes to economic development and is a major economic activity.

Verbal Reasoning Statement and Argument Difficulty: Medium
Choose an option
  • A
    if only argument I is strong.
  • B
    if only argument II is strong.
  • C
    If either I or II is strong.
  • D
    if neither I nor II is strong; and
  • E
    None of these

Answer

Correct Answer: If either I or II is strong.

Explanation

Introduction / Context:Zoning balances livability against economic vibrancy. Both sides can be strong if they address core planning objectives.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Residential well-being can be harmed by noise, traffic, and pollution from commercial uses.
  • Mixed-use, when planned, may boost local economies and convenience.

Concept / Approach:Argument I is strong because it focuses on resident health and livability. Argument II is strong because it references economic benefits. Since both are policy-relevant but in tension, either argument is strong.

Final Answer:Either Argument I or II is strong.

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion