Statement & Argument — Should India adopt two time zones? Arguments: I. Yes, many developed countries use multiple time zones. II. No, large countries like China use a single time zone.

Introduction / Context:
Time zone policy should be assessed on domestic criteria such as longitudinal spread, energy use, safety, transport scheduling, and administrative practicality. Mere analogies to other countries are insufficient.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Argument I cites practice elsewhere without connecting to India’s specific needs.
• Argument II cites China’s single zone, again without policy linkage to India’s context.
• Strong arguments should refer to measurable domestic outcomes (for example, daylight alignment, accident rates, productivity).

Concept / Approach:
Appeals to authority or analogy are weak if they do not translate into local benefits or costs. Both arguments lack India-specific reasoning.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Evaluate I: Merely says others do it; no India-focused rationale. Weak.2) Evaluate II: Merely says China does not; still not India-centric. Weak.

Verification / Alternative check:
Had either argument referenced sunrise misalignment in the northeast, school or rail timings, or grid load effects, it could be strong. As given, both are weak.

Final Answer:
Neither Argument I nor II is strong.