Statement & Argument — Should the public cooperate with bomb disposal squads? Arguments: I. Yes, cooperation is necessary to rescue lives and ensure safety. II. No, their activities are a nuisance to daily life.

Introduction / Context:
Emergency response scenarios prioritize life and safety. We must judge arguments by their relevance to that priority and proportionality of concerns.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Bomb disposal operations address immediate, significant threats to life and property.
• Public cooperation can enable quick cordons, evacuations, and information flow.
• Temporary inconvenience is secondary when compared with risk mitigation.

Concept / Approach:
A strong argument supports the primary policy objective. In emergencies, saving lives and preventing harm are paramount.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Argument I is specific, safety linked, and proportionate. Strong.2) Argument II cites inconvenience, which is minor relative to life safety. As framed, it is weak.

Verification / Alternative check:
Standard emergency doctrines emphasize public cooperation for rapid neutralization of threats.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
II does not override safety rationale; thus only I holds.

Common Pitfalls:
Overstating inconvenience in emergency contexts.

Final Answer:
Only Argument I is strong.