Statement & Argument — Should newspaper articles be written in simple language? Arguments: I. Yes, newspapers target the general reader. II. No, newspapers will lose respect if language is simplified.

Introduction / Context:
We evaluate language policy in news writing. A strong argument will refer to audience comprehension, accessibility, and the communicative purpose of journalism.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Newspapers address a mass audience with varied education levels.
• Clarity, accuracy, and accessibility are core journalism values.
• Respect for a publication is typically driven by credibility and quality, not complexity for its own sake.

Concept / Approach:
An argument is strong if it ties directly to the mission of newspapers: to inform the public effectively. Simplicity aids comprehension without necessarily reducing rigor or depth.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Argument I: Aligns with audience-centric communication. It is specific and relevant, hence strong.2) Argument II: Predicts loss of respect due to simple language without evidence. Respect correlates better with accuracy, fairness, and depth than with unnecessary verbosity. Hence, II is weak as stated.

Verification / Alternative check:
High-quality outlets often pair clear prose with deep reporting. Simplicity can coexist with sophistication.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
II alone is weak; both strong or either strong is not correct since II lacks a solid basis.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating complexity of language with intellectual merit.

Final Answer:
Only Argument I is strong.