Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Will vary depending on the language used
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Execution time determines how quickly control or application logic cycles, affecting responsiveness and determinism. It depends on code efficiency, language and runtime, compiler optimizations, hardware performance, and I/O latencies. Understanding these factors is crucial when coordinating software timing with mechanical or process dynamics.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Execution time per cycle (or per function) is influenced by instruction count, runtime services (garbage collection, VM), and I/O waits. Faster languages/compilers and better algorithms reduce timing. In control, scan time should be less than the smallest relevant process time constant to avoid aliasing and sluggish response.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Evaluate A: software “must be slower” than the fastest mechanical operation is incorrect; it generally must be fast enough to react within process deadlines.Evaluate B: language and implementation affect execution time—true.Evaluate C: timing can change via optimization, compiler flags, hardware upgrades, or algorithm changes—so false.Therefore, choose B.
Verification / Alternative check:
Benchmarking the same algorithm in C versus an interpreted language yields different throughput; PLC scan times vary by instruction set and hardware.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
A reverses the desirable relationship. C ignores the possibility of optimization and refactoring. D cannot hold if A and C are false.
Common Pitfalls:
Relying on nominal scan times without verifying worst-case path or I/O latency; ignoring garbage collection pauses in soft real-time systems.
Final Answer:
Will vary depending on the language used.
Discussion & Comments