Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Most industrial control personnel know ladder diagrams, making it the easiest for them to use
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Relay ladder logic (RLL) visually mimics traditional hardwired relay schematics, which were common before programmable controllers. Because technicians, electricians, and controls engineers were already fluent in relay diagrams, early PLC vendors adopted ladder logic as a programming notation to reduce retraining and ease troubleshooting.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The main driver for ladder logic adoption is workforce familiarity. Its contact-coil paradigm maps directly onto inputs, interlocks, and outputs; rungs resemble electrical circuits, making it intuitive to trace power flow and find faults. This improves uptime because technicians can diagnose issues without learning an entirely new programming model.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assess each claim for accuracy and practicality.Reject absolutist statements about impossibility or universal “best” status.Select the reasoning centered on personnel familiarity and ease of use.
Verification / Alternative check:
IEC 61131-3 supports multiple languages precisely because different plants prefer different paradigms. The enduring popularity of ladder logic is historically tied to maintainability and workforce skills—not technical exclusivity.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
(a) Many controllers support multiple languages; ladder is not the only option. (b) “Best” is context-dependent; complex algorithms often use structured text or function blocks. (d) cannot be true because (a) and (b) are not accurate.
Common Pitfalls:
Underestimating training needs when migrating to other languages; failing to document rung comments and tag names reduces ladder’s maintainability advantage.
Final Answer:
Most industrial control personnel know ladder diagrams, making it the easiest for them to use
Discussion & Comments