Statement: Many private schools have violated government directives by charging fees beyond specified limits. Courses of Action: I. Identify such schools and take stringent action as per law. II. Remove fee limits and let schools decide flexibly.

Introduction / Context:The statement specifies a violation of existing directives. Appropriate action is enforcement, not repeal. Policy changes (like deregulation) are separate debates and not an immediate remedy for non-compliance.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Fee caps exist and have been notified.
• Evidence of overcharging is reported.
• Regulators can investigate and penalise.

Concept / Approach:Rule of law: first enforce the current framework—audits, refunds, penalties. Structural reform can be considered later via stakeholder consultation if policy goals warrant it.

Step-by-Step Solution:1) Audit fee structures; mandate disclosure.2) Order refunds/credits where overcharging is proven.3) Penalise repeat offenders; create grievance redressal channels for parents.

Verification / Alternative check:Eliminating limits (II) does not address current violations and could worsen inequity.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:Only II/Either/Both: misaligned with the problem (violation of current rules).

Common Pitfalls:Assuming policy repeal retroactively legitimises past violations.

Final Answer:Only I follows.