Statement: In the North-Eastern parts of the country there have been incessant rains; heavy floods are not being ruled out.\nCourses of Action:\nI. Put the army on alert for possible flood relief operations.\nII. Take precautionary measures immediately (evacuation plans, stockpiles, embankment checks).

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Both I and II follow.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Flood risk escalates after persistent heavy rainfall. Sound disaster management integrates readiness of specialist responders and pre-emptive civilian precautions to reduce loss of life and property.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Incessant rains increase riverine and flash-flood likelihood.
  • Army often supports civil administration during disasters.
  • Precautionary steps can mitigate impact before waters rise.


Concept / Approach:
Adopt a two-layered approach: readiness (I) and prevention/mitigation (II). Putting the army on alert ensures rapid deployment; civilian measures—early warning, relief stockpiles, embankment inspection, controlled releases—reduce downstream harm.


Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Issue alerts to army/SDRF; pre-position boats, high-clearance vehicles, and medical kits.2) Warn at-risk communities; set up shelters and ensure water, sanitation, and lighting.3) Inspect embankments/sluice gates; coordinate reservoir management to balance inflows/outflows.


Verification / Alternative check:
Either action alone is weaker: readiness without precautions leads to reactive rescue; precautions without responder readiness limits surge capacity.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only I/Only II/Either undervalues complementarity. Neither ignores the explicit risk signal.


Common Pitfalls:
Late evacuation; poor last-mile alerting; insufficient relief stocks.


Final Answer:
Both I and II follow.

More Questions from Course of Action

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion