Statement: Despite repeated warnings to students and parents, some students have still failed to meet the mandatory 75% attendance required to appear for examinations.\nCourses of Action:\nI. The college should stop adhering to this attendance criterion.\nII. Call the parents/guardians of the defaulters for a meeting and enforce remedial steps.

Introduction / Context:
Attendance minima aim to ensure academic engagement. Persistent non-compliance after warnings calls for enforcement and remediation, not dilution of the standard.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The 75% rule is known and repeatedly communicated.
• Some students remain below threshold.
• Colleges can involve guardians for corrective plans.

Concept / Approach:
Academic integrity requires maintaining standards while offering remedies (attendance improvement plans, makeup labs/tutorials where regulations permit). Scrapping the rule (I) undercuts fairness to compliant students and future discipline.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Notify defaulters; require guardian meetings to discuss causes and plans.2) Provide allowable remedial mechanisms (medical condonation as per rules, extra assignments/practicals) without compromising policy.3) Enforce consequences for persistent default per regulations.

Verification / Alternative check:
Maintaining criteria aligns incentives; parental involvement increases accountability and support.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I: Removes a legitimate requirement. Either/Both/Neither: Only II is the proportionate step.

Common Pitfalls:
Inconsistent enforcement; granting blanket condonation without documented grounds.

Final Answer:
Only II follows.