Comparing nylons: relative to nylon-66, nylon-6 is generally… (choose the correct statement).
-
AHarder than nylon-66
-
BMore abrasion resistant than nylon-66
-
CHaving higher melting point than nylon-66
-
DNone of these
-
EMore easily dyed than nylon-66
Answer
Correct Answer: None of these
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Nylon-6 and nylon-66 are two widely used polyamides with similar structures and overlapping applications. Subtle differences in melting point, abrasion resistance, and hardness influence material selection.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Nylon-66 typically melts around 255–265 °C; nylon-6 around 215–225 °C.
- Nylon-66 often shows slightly higher stiffness, hardness, and abrasion resistance.
- Nylon-6 is noted for better dye uptake and impact at low temperatures.
Concept / Approach:The higher melting point and crystallinity of nylon-66 stem from its even-numbered monomers (HMDA + adipic acid) enabling efficient hydrogen bonding and packing. Nylon-6 (from caprolactam) has lower Tm and generally slightly lower hardness and abrasion resistance relative to nylon-66.
Step-by-Step Solution:Check melting point claim: nylon-6 does not exceed nylon-66 → (c) false.Check hardness/abrasion: nylon-66 commonly superior → (a) and (b) false.Thus, the correct choice among the given is “None of these.”
Verification / Alternative check:Datasheets and handbooks consistently report nylon-66 higher Tm and often higher wear resistance; nylon-6 better dyeability.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:(a), (b), (c) contradict typical property data.Option (e) is true in many cases, but it is not among the choices for the main selection—hence (d) fits the question’s intent.
Common Pitfalls:Overgeneralising across grades filled with glass/minerals; mixing copolyamides with homopolymers.
Final Answer:None of these