Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Both I and II are implicit.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Creating specialized cadres is an institutional reform intended to improve execution capacity. The Panchayati Raj system emphasizes decentralized governance; strengthening it typically requires technical and administrative support.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
A reform proposal presupposes that (a) the reform will help reach stated goals, and (b) current arrangements have shortcomings requiring correction.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) The purpose—“to strengthen Panchayati Raj”—implies that additional capacity is helpful (I).2) The creation of new cadres presumes present implementation difficulties—skill gaps, coordination issues, or engineering bandwidth shortages (II).3) Together, these assumptions justify the institutional change; without either, the reform would seem unnecessary or misdirected.
Verification / Alternative check:
If current implementation were smooth, new cadres would be redundant. If cadres could not contribute to execution, the measure would not strengthen the system. Hence both assumptions are needed.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Only I or only II omits part of the rationale; “either” fails because the proposal needs both problem recognition and solution efficacy. “Neither” ignores the basic logic of administrative reforms.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing political intent with operational necessity; the very act of creating cadres indicates acknowledged implementation constraints and expected benefits.
Final Answer:
Both I and II are implicit.
Discussion & Comments