Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: all of these
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Production scheduling translates plans into executable shop-floor sequences. Effective schedules balance capacity, precedence, and standard times while honoring product design constraints. Ignoring any element leads to missed due dates or excessive WIP.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Component design drives tolerances, required processes, and inspection. The route sheet encodes feasible sequences and eligible resources. Time standards allow loading, line balancing, due-date promise, and capacity checks. Together they enable backward/forward scheduling, dispatching rules, and realistic completion dates.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Gantt charts and finite-capacity scheduling simulations confirm feasibility; KPIs like on-time delivery and queue lengths validate the plan.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Focusing on a single factor (e.g., machine availability) ignores precedence and timing detail, leading to infeasible schedules.
Common Pitfalls:
Using outdated route sheets; neglecting changeover times; relying on guessed times instead of measured standards.
Final Answer:
all of these
Discussion & Comments