Critical reasoning — politics and money: From the statement 'Money plays a vital role in politics', decide whether it logically follows that the poor can never enter politics or that all rich people necessarily participate

Given data

• Statement: Money plays a vital role in politics.
• Conclusions:
  • I: The poor can never become politicians.
  • II: All the rich men take part in politics.

Concept/Approach

'Vital role' denotes importance, not exclusivity or universality. Absolute claims ('never', 'all') require explicit support.

Step-by-Step logic
1) I claims impossibility for the poor. The statement does not assert that; some poor can still become politicians ⇒ I does not follow.2) II claims every rich person engages in politics. The statement does not generalize participation across all rich individuals ⇒ II does not follow.

Verification/Alternative

Importance of money can coexist with exceptions: poor candidates with support/donations; rich individuals avoiding politics.

Common pitfalls

• Turning 'vital' into 'exclusive requirement'.
• Assuming universals from a general observation.

Final Answer
Neither I nor II follows.