Critical reasoning — proverb interpretation: From the adage 'A bird in hand is worth two in the bush', infer whether contentment with existing gains and avoiding unnecessary craving for uncertain gains both logically follow

Given data

• Proverbial statement: 'A bird in hand is worth two in the bush.'
• Conclusions:
  • I: We should be content with what we have.
  • II: We should not crave for what is not.

Concept/Approach

The proverb values a certain possession over uncertain prospects and advises prudence, which implies contentment and restraint.

Step-by-Step logic
1) Preferring the certain 'bird in hand' supports contentment ⇒ I follows.2) Devaluing the uncertain 'two in the bush' cautions against craving the uncertain at the cost of the certain ⇒ II follows.

Verification/Alternative

Many standard reasoning keys treat both conclusions as aligned with the proverb’s core message of prudence over risky temptation.

Common pitfalls

• Reading the proverb as a ban on all ambition; it recommends prudence, not stagnation.

Final Answer
Both I and II follow.