Home » Logical Reasoning » Statement and Conclusion

Critical reasoning — admissions eligibility vs selection: If eligibility requires a minimum second-class Master's degree and candidates appearing in the final exam may also apply, decide whether it follows that all such candidates will be selected

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Neither I nor II follows

Explanation:

Given data

  • Statement: Eligibility = at least second-class Master's; appearing candidates (final year) may also apply.
  • Conclusions:
    • I: All who have yet to get their Master's degree will appear in the selected list.
    • II: All who have obtained second-class Master's will appear in the selected list.

Concept/Approach

Eligibility to apply ≠ guarantee of selection. Selection depends on merit, availability, and criteria beyond baseline eligibility.


Step-by-Step logic
1) I does not follow: permission to apply while awaiting results does not ensure selection.2) II does not follow: meeting the minimum degree class does not imply automatic selection.


Verification/Alternative

Typical processes: eligible candidates compete; only some are selected based on further assessment.


Common pitfalls

  • Conflating 'eligibility' with 'admission granted'.

Final Answer
Neither I nor II follows.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion