Question 1

Reading comprehension—best supported inference: A publisher estimates 50,000–60,000 U.S. readers want a complete Shakespeare anthology; scholars attribute renewed interest to Shakespeare's remarkable psychological insights into male and female chara…

Accepted Answer

Given data Estimated demand for a complete Shakespeare anthology: 50,000–60,000 people in the U.S. Reason for renewed interest (per scholars): Shakespeare's psychological insights into both male and female characters remain amazing even today. Concept / Approach Identify the claim directly supported by the stated reason for renewed interest. Step-by-step reasoning Step 1: The paragraph explicitly connects current interest to the quality of Shakespeare's character insights.Step 2: Option B restates that connection: people today are interested in Shakespeare because of his characters.Step 3: Options A, C, D, and E introduce new claims not stated (comparisons to modern fiction, who is compiling an anthology, a New York–specific trend, or Shakespeare's profession). Verification / Alternative view If the interest stems from psychological insight, then a statement attributing interest to characters is best supported. Common pitfalls Choosing answers that are plausible but not textually supported. Confusing an estimate of demand with evidence about who is publishing the anthology. Final Answer People today are interested in Shakespeare's work because of the depth of his characters.

Question 2

Reading comprehension—best supported inference: An unusually warm winter has encouraged consumers to spend; spending is likely to be the strongest in thirteen years; February sales of existing single-family homes reached a record annual rate of 4.75…

Accepted Answer

Given data Warm winter → consumers in the mood to spend. Spending likely strongest in 13 years. February: existing single-family home sales at a record annual rate (4.75M). Concept / Approach Look for the option that ties warm winter conditions to home-sale activity without adding unsupported specifics. Step-by-step reasoning Step 1: The text links warm weather to higher spending.Step 2: It then cites record home sales—a category of consumer spending.Step 3: Therefore, it supports the idea that warm winter weather can affect (increase) the rate of home sales. Verification / Alternative view Options A–D introduce time predictions, month comparisons, price claims, or inventory counts that are not stated. Common pitfalls Reading quantities (4.75M) as inventory rather than sales pace. Assuming seasonality or prices not mentioned in the passage. Final Answer Warm winter weather is likely to affect the rate of home sales.

Question 3

Reading comprehension—best supported inference: Generation X (born ~1965–1981) are most challenged when allowed to work independently, which purportedly makes them the most entrepreneurial generation; which option is best supported by this paragraph?

Accepted Answer

Given data Generation Xers (born roughly 1965–1981). They feel more challenged when they can carry out tasks independently. This is used to argue they are highly entrepreneurial. Concept / Approach Select the statement that directly reflects independence in work style. Step-by-step reasoning Step 1: "More challenged when independent" implies they prefer autonomy.Step 2: Option B (self-directed workers) restates that preference for autonomy.Step 3: Options A, C, D, E add claims (effort level, history-making, risk-taking, boss-challenging) not asserted. Verification / Alternative view Being entrepreneurial is consistent with self-direction, but the paragraph does not compare effort levels or specify risk behavior. Common pitfalls Equating "entrepreneurial" with "risk-seeking" or "confrontational," which the passage does not say. Final Answer Generation Xers have a tendency to be self-directed workers.

Question 4

Reading comprehension—best supported inference: For fitness walkers, a commute to a health club is unnecessary; your neighborhood can serve as your health club; little equipment is needed beyond a well-designed pair of athletic shoes. Which statemen…

Accepted Answer

Given data No commute is needed for fitness walking; the neighborhood suffices. Fancy equipment is unnecessary; a good pair of athletic shoes is sufficient. Concept / Approach Identify the option that captures convenience and value without inserting extra claims. Step-by-step reasoning Step 1: No commute + minimal equipment ⇒ high convenience.Step 2: The framing of "all you need is shoes" suggests accessibility and value.Step 3: Option D summarizes these points. Options A–C, E add comparisons or injury claims not stated. Verification / Alternative view The paragraph never ranks exercises or critiques club memberships; it highlights convenience and sufficiency. Common pitfalls Reading evaluative judgments (e.g., "better than weight lifting") into a purely descriptive passage. Final Answer Fitness walking is a convenient and valuable form of exercise.

Question 5

Reading comprehension—best supported inference: Historically, consumers rarely ordered low-fat ice cream; today, greater health consciousness and a wider selection of tasty low-fat foods have made low-fat ice cream a very profitable item for shop ow…

Accepted Answer

Given data Past: customers rarely ordered low-fat ice cream. Present: increased health consciousness + more tasty low-fat options ⇒ low-fat ice cream is very profitable for store owners. Concept / Approach Link the profit observation to the updated perception of item popularity by owners. Step-by-step reasoning Step 1: If an item is "very profitable," owners will not consider it unpopular.Step 2: Option C restates that updated perception. Options A, B, D, E assert relative revenues, exclusivity, relative popularity, or consumer psychology that the passage does not claim. Verification / Alternative view Profitability is a strong indicator that demand has risen sufficiently to change owners' views. Common pitfalls Inferring cross-category comparisons (e.g., low-fat vs. other foods) that are not supported. Final Answer Ice cream store owners no longer think that low-fat ice cream is an unpopular item.

Question 6

In today's high schools, students spend excessive time focusing on trivial and distracting matters such as fashion and often dress inappropriately on school grounds; rather than writing yet another detailed dress policy, making school uniforms manda…

Accepted Answer

Given data Students spend too much time on trivial distractions like fashion and often dress inappropriately on campus. Instead of drafting another dress policy, the author proposes mandatory school uniforms. Claimed benefits: stronger sense of community and harmony, greater discipline, and reduced need for teachers and administrators to police clothing. Concept/Approach (critical reasoning: main-support match) Identify the author's central recommendation and the reasons that support it, then choose the statement that the paragraph most directly endorses. Step 1: Extract the core recommendation Core recommendation = Make school uniforms mandatory. Step 2: Link reasons to the recommendation Reasons cite community/harmony, discipline, and freeing staff from clothing-police duties. All are benefits of uniforms. Step 3: Eliminate scope-creep claims No evidence that uniforms improve college admissions or that inappropriate clothing causes failing grades, nor that students reject community in general, nor any quantified 25% policing time. Verification/Alternative If the passage were summarized in one line, it would say: "Therefore, uniforms should be compulsory." This exactly matches the correct option. Common pitfalls Do not choose options that add new statistics, predict admissions outcomes, or generalize about student motives; the paragraph does not support those. Final Answer School uniforms should be compulsory for high school students.

Question 7

The criminal justice system should change to become more just by allowing victims to confront offenders and by enabling mediation that lets offenders apologize; based on this rationale, this paragraph best supports which specific right for victims?

Accepted Answer

Given data The system could be more just if victims could confront offenders. Mediation would allow offenders to apologize to victims. Concept/Approach (identify supported entitlement) We look for the entitlement clearly advocated by the text, without importing punishment powers or moral duties not mentioned. Step 1: Identify the explicit recommendation "Allow victims the opportunity to confront the person who harmed them." Step 2: Separate process from punishment The paragraph discusses confrontation and mediation (restorative-justice processes), not sentencing or mandatory forgiveness. Step 3: Match to the closest option The right to confront offenders is directly and explicitly supported. Verification/Alternative If the recommendation were implemented, victims would indeed have a confrontation opportunity; this is the exact wording of the correct answer. Common pitfalls Avoid options that add punishment authority, compulsory forgiveness, or training requirements; these extend beyond the passage. Final Answer Victims should have the right to confront their offenders.

Question 8

Some states are considering laws that prohibit calculator use before sixth grade, while other states insist every middle schooler have a graphing calculator; taken together, this paragraph best supports which conclusion about policy views on calcula…

Accepted Answer

Given data One group of states seeks to prohibit calculators before grade six. Another group insists on graphing calculators for all middle school students. Concept/Approach (extract the minimal warranted inference) Infer only what both lines of evidence jointly guarantee: policy positions diverge. Step 1: Recognize opposing policies Prohibition vs. requirement shows clear disagreement. Step 2: Avoid overreach Nothing is said about learning harm, cost in bulk, or historical involvement of legislators. Step 3: Select the precise supported statement "There are at least two opinions" exactly captures the supported conclusion. Verification/Alternative Imagining a map: some states restrict, others mandate; hence multiple viewpoints exist. Common pitfalls Do not infer outcomes (learning results, pricing) not mentioned in the passage. Final Answer There are at least two distinct opinions about using calculators in schools.

Question 9

Compared with a decade ago, today's workforce reflects different social values: a manager offered a faraway promotion may now prioritize family happiness over career advancement; this paragraph therefore best supports which statement about workplace…

Accepted Answer

Given data Ten years ago, relocation for promotion was typically unquestioned. Today, a manager might choose family happiness instead of advancement. Concept/Approach (trend identification without exaggeration) We seek the modest, directly warranted trend: values have shifted, not that ambition is dead or companies must force moves. Step 1: Extract the comparison Past norm vs. present alternative choice indicates a change in priorities. Step 2: Match to a neutral, supported generalization "Employees social values have changed" captures the observation without overclaiming. Step 3: Eliminate overstatements Nothing supports lack of loyalty, lack of importance of career, or managerial misunderstanding. Verification/Alternative If more workers now weigh family highly, that is precisely a shift in social values. Common pitfalls Avoid absolute claims such as "career is not important" or prescriptive mandates about company policy. Final Answer Employees social values have changed over the past ten years.

Question 10

Because the world urgently needs adequate distribution of both food and medicine, with medical expertise and supplies redistributed so that emerging nations receive proper care, this paragraph best supports which conclusion about global healthcare a…

Accepted Answer

Given data There is an urgent need to redistribute medical expertise and supplies globally. The goal is to ensure people in emerging nations receive proper care. Concept/Approach (necessary implication) If redistribution is urgently needed to achieve proper care, then at present many do not have proper care. Step 1: Translate the recommendation "Redistribute" implies a current shortfall where it is needed. Step 2: Identify the target population The text emphasizes emerging nations as the beneficiaries. Step 3: Choose the minimally sufficient inference Therefore, many people in emerging nations lack proper medical care. Verification/Alternative If proper care already existed widely, a call for urgent redistribution would be unnecessary. Common pitfalls Do not assume motives of doctors, changes in food production, or industry output; these are not discussed. Final Answer Many people living in emerging nations are not receiving proper medical care.

Question 11

Reading inference — choosing the best-supported statement about yoga classes  A short passage explains that yoga is popular but may not suit everyone. It advises readers to think about what they want from a fitness routine. If someone seeks a high-e…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This evidence-based reading question asks you to pick the conclusion directly supported by the paragraph. The passage emphasizes aligning one’s fitness choices with personal goals and flags that a high-energy aerobic seeker may not find yoga ideal. Your task is to avoid overgeneralizations and choose the modest, text-anchored claim. Given Data / Assumptions: Yoga is popular. It may not fit everyone. Readers should examine what they want from fitness before signing up. If someone wants high-energy, fast-paced aerobics, yoga might not be the best choice. Concept / Approach: Select the option that restates the core message without adding claims that are not stated. The best-supported inference is a general guideline about reflecting on needs before choosing a class. Avoid options that make comparative or global claims not present in the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the thesis: choose your exercise based on your goals.Note the example: someone wanting fast-paced aerobics may find yoga unsuitable.Prefer the option that captures this advice succinctly.Option B does exactly this. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: Popularity comparison isn’t discussed. C: “Changing the world of fitness” is not asserted. D: While often true, the passage doesn’t argue this. E: The passage does not claim what “most people think.” Common Pitfalls: Picking an answer that is true in the real world but not supported by the specific text. Always tether your choice to explicit or clearly implied statements. Final Answer: before embarking on a new exercise regimen, you should think about your needs and desires.

Question 12

Reading inference — technological change over time  A paragraph describes the evolution of technology: early stone tools appeared about 2.5 million years ago; progress was very slow for hundreds of thousands of years; today, new technologies are rep…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The question asks you to identify the conclusion most directly supported by the text. The passage contrasts a long period of slow change in prehistory with the rapid pace of innovation today, as evidenced by daily media reports of new technologies. Given Data / Assumptions: Stone tools originated roughly 2.5 million years ago. Technological development was slow for hundreds of thousands of years. Currently, new technologies are reported daily on mass media. Concept / Approach: Choose the inference that restates the present-day theme: frequent, ongoing technological development. Reject options that introduce claims not made or that misinterpret the timeline provided. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the contrast: slow long ago vs. rapid now.Focus on the explicit evidence: “reported daily” suggests continual emergence of new tech.Match this to the option that asserts continuous development in today’s world.Select option D. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: The passage treats stone tools as technology, not as “not technology.” B: The passage states when they first appeared, not that they were used unchanged for the entire 2.5 million years. C: It asserts a time estimate, so we do have some knowledge. E: No comparative value judgment is made about significance. Common Pitfalls: Confusing background facts (stone tools, prehistory) with the main claim. The core takeaway concerns the current pace of change. Final Answer: In today's world, new technologies are constantly being developed

Question 13

Reading inference — what is most strongly supported about mathematics and figures?  A paragraph states that mathematics expands our understanding, reveals trends and patterns, and exposes truth, but can also perpetuate misunderstandings; figures hav…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This inference question emphasizes reading precisely. While the paragraph praises mathematics for exposing truth, it also cautions that figures can mislead and spread untruths. The correct answer must reflect this duality without adding claims not present in the text. Given Data / Assumptions: Mathematics helps us understand trends, patterns, and growth. Math can expose the truth. At the same time, misunderstandings and untruths can be perpetuated through figures. Figures can mislead people. Concept / Approach: Select the option that mirrors the explicit caution: figures may deceive. Avoid extreme or comparative statements that the paragraph does not make, such as ranking disciplines or asserting that numbers never lie. Step-by-Step Solution: Extract the cautionary clause: “figures have the power to mislead.”Translate into a concise statement that fits an answer choice.Option E states: “figures are sometimes used to deceive people.”Confirm no stronger claim (always, never) is being made in the text. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: “Dangerous” is not claimed. B: No comparison between words and figures is given. C: No ranking of disciplines is offered. D: The text explicitly says figures can mislead, contradicting the idea that they cannot lie. Common Pitfalls: Choosing an answer that sounds insightful but goes beyond the text. Evidence-based questions reward fidelity to what is stated or clearly implied. Final Answer: figures are sometimes used to deceive people.

Question 14

Reading inference — Miranda warnings and police interrogations  A passage explains the 1966 Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona: before police can obtain statements in an interrogation, they must issue a Miranda warning telling the person t…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This passage focuses on constitutional criminal procedure. The key point is that statements resulting from custodial interrogation are inadmissible unless preceded by a Miranda warning informing the person of the right to remain silent. Your job is to choose the statement that most directly reflects this rule. Given Data / Assumptions: Before obtaining statements during interrogation, police must give a Miranda warning. The warning includes the right to remain silent. If police violate this requirement, the statements are not admissible in court. Concept / Approach: Favor the option that paraphrases the procedural precondition: Miranda must precede interrogation if statements are to be used. Avoid options that introduce new legal conclusions (criminal liability for police, mandatory lawyer presence) not stated in the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the necessary condition: warning before interrogation statements are taken.Map this requirement to the answer choices.Option B restates the rule succinctly and accurately.Eliminate choices that add unstated consequences or opinions. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: The text does not say officers commit a crime if they fail to warn. C: A lawyer’s presence is not stated as mandatory; the focus is on warnings. D: No normative judgment about reversal appears. E: Strategic advice is beyond the passage’s scope. Common Pitfalls: Confusing exclusionary rules (inadmissibility) with criminal penalties for police. Also, do not infer a right-to-counsel requirement where the passage only specifies warnings. Final Answer: a Miranda warning must be given before a police interrogation can begin.

Question 15

Reading inference — how jury roles have changed since colonial America  The passage says that in colonial times American juries were encouraged to ask questions and expected to investigate facts themselves. Today, if jurors conducted such an investi…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This question assesses your ability to extract the safest, text-supported inference. The passage contrasts historical and modern expectations of jurors: active investigation then versus prohibition now. The cleanest conclusion is that the jury system has changed over time. Given Data / Assumptions: Colonial-era juries asked questions and investigated facts. Modern jurors who independently investigate would cause a case to be thrown out. No claims are made about interest levels, efficiency, or importance. Concept / Approach: Prefer general, conservative inferences tied directly to the stated contrast. Avoid speculative comparisons (importance, interest, efficiency) lacking textual support. Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize the explicit contrast in roles and procedures.Generalize minimally: procedures and expectations changed.Match to the option stating that the jury system has changed.Select option E. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: “Less important” is not addressed. B: “Less interested” is not addressed. C: “More efficient” is not supported. D: The passage does not claim relative information levels. Common Pitfalls: Reading beyond the text to infer attitudes or values (importance, efficiency). The question asks what is best supported, not what might be true. Final Answer: the jury system in America has changed since colonial times.

Question 16

Reading inference — cross-border pollutants and banned insecticides  A paragraph notes there are no effective boundaries for pollutants. Toxic insecticides banned in many countries ride the wind from places where they remain legal; compounds like DD…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The passage highlights atmospheric transport of pollutants and mentions that some toxic insecticides banned in many countries are still legal in others, resulting in global spread. The question asks for the statement most directly supported by these facts. Given Data / Assumptions: Pollutants cross borders; wind can carry them long distances. Some toxic insecticides have been banned in many countries but remain legal elsewhere. DDT and toxaphene residues are found even in remote Arctic regions. Concept / Approach: Choose the option that restates an explicit claim from the text: that bans are not universal. Avoid options that generalize beyond the evidence (e.g., about relative pollution levels in climates) or that add unsupported claims (e.g., world’s most toxic). Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the explicit contrast: banned in many places, still legal in others.Translate to: these insecticides are not banned globally.Match to option A.Reject options introducing new, unsubstantiated claims. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: B: The passage does not compare polar vs. warm areas quantitatively. C: It does not say countries ignore their own laws; it says some countries still legally allow the chemicals. D: “Most toxic” is not claimed. E: A worldwide ban’s hypothetical effect is not discussed. Common Pitfalls: Mistaking “found in the Arctic” for “more in the Arctic,” or reading policy predictions into a descriptive text. Stick to the explicit statement about non-universal bans. Final Answer: toxic insecticides such as DDT have not been banned throughout the world.

Question 17

Reading inference — Fourth Amendment searches and warrants  The paragraph states that the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. A search of a person’s home or personal effects requires a written warrant issued on prob…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: This legal-reasoning question focuses on constitutional requirements for searching a home or private papers. The text emphasizes a written warrant, issued on probable cause by a neutral judge, as a prerequisite for such searches. Given Data / Assumptions: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. No search of home or personal effects may occur without a written search warrant. A neutral judge must approve the factual basis (probable cause) before the search. Concept / Approach: Reduce the requirement to its essence: police need lawful authorization—specifically a warrant based on probable cause approved by a judge. Among the options, “legal authorization” succinctly captures this requirement without adding unsupported specifics. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the controlling rule: warrant required for homes/papers.Recognize warrant = legal authorization issued on probable cause by a judge.Map to options: choose the one that expresses this necessity in general terms.Select option A: legal authorization. Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: B: Direct evidence is not required; probable cause can rest on reasonable facts short of direct proof. C: Reading rights relates to interrogations, not searches. D: “Reasonable belief” is imprecise; the passage specifies probable cause plus judicial approval. E: The judge approves the warrant; the judge need not be physically present during the search. Common Pitfalls: Confusing probable cause with stricter or looser standards, or mixing interrogation safeguards with search requirements. Always match your answer to the exact procedural safeguard described. Final Answer: legal authorization

Question 18

Critical reading – obesity and public health response Read the paragraph: Obesity is a serious national problem that can lead to diabetes, asthma, heart disease, and possibly some cancers. The passage argues that major public-health campaigns which …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Critical reading questions ask you to select the claim that is most directly supported by the author’s text, without adding new assumptions. Here the passage lists health risks of obesity and recommends a public-health strategy as a “crucial first step.” Given Data / Assumptions: Obesity is serious and linked to diabetes, asthma, heart disease, and possibly certain cancers. Major public-health campaigns can raise awareness and propose simple lifestyle changes. With diligence and desire, such changes can eliminate or at least mitigate obesity’s incidence. These campaigns are described as a “crucial first step.” Concept / Approach: Select the statement that is an immediate, conservative inference from the passage. Prefer wording that mirrors the author’s emphasis on awareness and lifestyle change as an effective first step, rather than extreme or unmentioned claims. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the author’s main actionable point: launch public-health campaigns to fight obesity.Map this to the answer choice that says such campaigns are a productive way to fight obesity.Eliminate choices that introduce specifics (TV habits, fast food, asthma rates) not asserted in the passage. Verification / Alternative check: Paraphrase: “Campaigns that raise awareness and offer simple changes are a crucial first step.” This directly supports the productivity of such campaigns. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Leading cause of diabetes” is not stated; diabetes is one of several risks. TV/exercise habits are not discussed. “Radically decrease asthma” is stronger than the text supports. Fast-food/school lunches are never mentioned. Common Pitfalls: Choosing an option that seems plausible in real life but is not explicitly supported by the specific paragraph. Final Answer: public health campaigns that raise consciousness and propose lifestyle changes are a productive way to fight obesity.

Question 19

Critical reading – what does “critical reading” require? Read: Critical reading is demanding; you must slow down, mark the text with reactions, conclusions, and questions, and become an active participant. What statement is best supported?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The goal is to select the statement that the author’s words directly justify. The passage describes critical reading as deliberate (“slow down”) and active (“pencil in hand,” “mark up the text,” “become an active participant”). Given Data / Assumptions: You must slow down when reading critically. You should annotate with reactions, conclusions, and questions. Critical reading is an active, participatory process. Concept / Approach: Translate the behaviors described into an abstract requirement: thoughtful, careful attention to the text. Avoid options that add value judgments (“dull”), timing prescriptions, or claims not present in the passage. Step-by-Step Solution: Note the directives: slow down, mark up, question—these require attention and thought.Match to option: “requires thoughtful and careful attention.”Reject options that are not supported (e.g., best done at certain “times,” daily scheduling, or “dull”). Verification / Alternative check: If a process asks you to slow down and annotate, it plainly demands careful attention; this aligns with the correct option. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Slow, dull, but essential” adds “dull,” which the text never states. “Best … at critical times” is unrelated. “Get in the habit of questioning truth” is plausible but not the main supported claim; the text stresses overall attentiveness. “Same time each day” is not mentioned. Common Pitfalls: Confusing a single tactic (questioning) with the broader requirement (attentive, active reading). Final Answer: critical reading requires thoughtful and careful attention.

Question 20

Critical reading – sun exposure warnings vs. adult behavior The passage describes abundant products and public campaigns (e.g., National Skin Cancer Awareness Month) warning about UV danger, yet a survey finds fewer than half of adults adequately pr…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The author contrasts plentiful warnings/products with a survey outcome: fewer than half of adults protect themselves adequately. The task is to infer the most directly supported conclusion. Given Data / Assumptions: Many sun-protection products exist and campaigns warn of UV risk. Despite this, fewer than 50% of adults protect themselves adequately. No comparative data about children, sales levels, or cancer incidence trends are provided. Concept / Approach: Reason to the simplest explanation linked by the text: adult behavior is not matching guidance; hence warnings are not being heeded seriously enough. Step-by-Step Solution: Observe mismatch: high awareness efforts vs. low compliance.Translate to conclusion: adults are not following the guidance seriously.Eliminate choices introducing new claims (children vs. adults, record sales, cancer rates, lack of information). Verification / Alternative check: Even if information is abundant, poor adherence yields the survey result; thus the supported conclusion is about adult behavior, not information scarcity. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Children vs. adults: not discussed. All-time high sales: not given. More cancer now: not in text. “Not enough information”: contradicts the description of many campaigns. Common Pitfalls: Confusing availability of information with compliance; the survey points to behavior, not awareness gaps. Final Answer: adults are not heeding the warnings about the dangers of sun exposure seriously enough.

Analyzing Arguments Questions