Reading inference — what is most strongly supported about mathematics and figures? A paragraph states that mathematics expands our understanding, reveals trends and patterns, and exposes truth, but can also perpetuate misunderstandings; figures have the power to mislead. Which statement is best supported by this paragraph?
-
Athe study of mathematics is dangerous.
-
Bwords are more truthful than figures.
-
Cthe study of mathematics is more important than other disciplines.
-
Dthe power of numbers is that they cannot lie.
-
Efigures are sometimes used to deceive people.
Answer
Correct Answer: figures are sometimes used to deceive people.
Explanation
Introduction / Context:This inference question emphasizes reading precisely. While the paragraph praises mathematics for exposing truth, it also cautions that figures can mislead and spread untruths. The correct answer must reflect this duality without adding claims not present in the text.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Mathematics helps us understand trends, patterns, and growth.
- Math can expose the truth.
- At the same time, misunderstandings and untruths can be perpetuated through figures.
- Figures can mislead people.
Concept / Approach:Select the option that mirrors the explicit caution: figures may deceive. Avoid extreme or comparative statements that the paragraph does not make, such as ranking disciplines or asserting that numbers never lie.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Extract the cautionary clause: “figures have the power to mislead.”Translate into a concise statement that fits an answer choice.Option E states: “figures are sometimes used to deceive people.”Confirm no stronger claim (always, never) is being made in the text.Verification / Alternative check: Why Other Options Are Wrong: Common Pitfalls:Choosing an answer that sounds insightful but goes beyond the text. Evidence-based questions reward fidelity to what is stated or clearly implied. Final Answer:figures are sometimes used to deceive people.