Switch debouncing practice: “J–K flip-flops are often used as switch debouncers.” Assess the validity of this claim based on common design approaches.

Introduction / Context:
Mechanical switches bounce, producing multiple transitions. Debouncing circuits ensure a single clean transition is delivered to digital logic. This question asks whether J–K flip-flops are the commonly used solution.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Goal: remove contact bounce from a mechanical switch.
• Candidate device: J–K flip-flop.
• Industry practice favors simple, robust solutions.

Concept / Approach:
Common hardware debouncers include SR latches using cross-coupled NAND/NOR gates, dedicated debounce ICs, Schmitt-trigger inputs with RC filters, and D-type flip-flops clocked from a conditioned signal. J–K flip-flops, especially level-sensitive versions, can suffer race-around when both J and K are high under long clock pulses. While it is possible to craft a JK-based debounce, it is not the typical or recommended approach compared to D latches/latches with Schmitt-trigger conditioning.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Application notes and textbooks typically show SR-latch or D-FF debouncers; JK appears rarely and usually in educational examples, not as the mainstream solution.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Correct: Overstates the role of JK in debouncing.

Conditional options: Constraints do not turn JK into the common choice; other solutions are simpler and more robust.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating “flip-flops can debounce” with “JK is most used.” The type matters; D or SR is simpler and safer.

Final Answer:
Incorrect