Cost of canal lining: If a canal has total length L (in km), perimeter of lining P (in m), and lining cost C (₹ per m²), what is the additional expenditure on providing lining?
-
AL * P * C
-
B1000 * L * P * C
-
C(P / L) * C
-
D(L * C) / P
-
EP * C / 1000
Answer
Correct Answer: 1000 * L * P * C
Explanation
Introduction / Context:
Lining a canal reduces seepage and enhances hydraulic efficiency, but it incurs a capital cost proportional to the area lined. For a prismatic canal, the lined area equals the plan length of the canal multiplied by the wetted perimeter being lined. Converting units consistently is the key to a correct cost estimate.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Total canal length L is given in kilometres.
- Perimeter of lining P is given in metres (the wetted perimeter or specified portion to be lined).
- Lining cost C is given per square metre.
- Continuous lining along the full length is assumed.
Concept / Approach:
Area to be lined A = (length in metres) * (perimeter in metres). Since L is in km, convert to metres by multiplying with 1000. Thus A = (1000 * L) * P. Total lining cost = A * C.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Convert length: L_km → L_m = 1000 * L.Compute area: A = (1000 * L) * P.Compute cost: Cost = A * C = 1000 * L * P * C.Verification / Alternative check:
Dimensional check: L (km) → m, so 1000 * L is in metres. Multiplying by P (m) gives area (m²). Multiplying by C (₹/m²) gives ₹, as required.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- L * P * C: Misses the km→m conversion factor.
- (P / L) * C or (L * C) / P: Do not represent an area; wrong dimensions.
- P * C / 1000: Inverts the conversion; underestimates the cost drastically.
Common Pitfalls:
- Forgetting the unit conversion from km to m.
- Using wetted perimeter at one depth while costing a different lining extent; ensure P matches the lined profile.
Final Answer:
1000 * L * P * C