Irrigation agronomy: What is the typical design depth of the root zone for rice (paddy) considered in irrigation calculations?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 60 cm

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:

Root zone depth is a key agronomic parameter used in irrigation design to estimate soil water storage, application depth, and scheduling. For paddy (rice), designers adopt a representative depth that captures most active roots and soil moisture extraction under field conditions.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Conventional flooded paddy with puddled soil and typical bunded fields.
  • Design parameter is a representative root zone depth used for water balance and percolation estimates.
  • Climatic and varietal variations exist, but standard handbook values are used for design.


Concept / Approach:

Although rice can have shallower effective roots due to puddling (often 20–30 cm active zone), irrigation design commonly uses 0.6 m (60 cm) as a conservative depth for storage/percolation accounting, especially for canal command planning and duty/delta calculations.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the standard design practice → adopt 60 cm for paddy root zone in irrigation computations.Select the matching option → 60 cm.


Verification / Alternative check:

Standard agronomy/irrigation tables list design root zone depths for crops; rice is typically taken as ~0.6 m for canal design and seasonal water requirement estimation, aligning with field experience and conservative storage assumptions.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • 50 cm: Sometimes used locally, but 60 cm is the widely adopted design value.
  • 70–90 cm: Exceeds typical effective rooting depth for puddled rice and would overstate storage/percolation.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Confusing agronomic active root depth with design storage depth; projects use standardized values for consistency.
  • Ignoring soil type and puddling effects which limit deep rooting.


Final Answer:

60 cm

More Questions from Irrigation

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion