Introduction / Context:
In legal and investigative writing, “corroborate” means to provide independent evidence that confirms a claim. It is stronger than mere agreement; it implies verification by additional proof or testimony. This nuance distinguishes it from everyday approval or endorsement terms.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Target verb: “corroborated.”
- Context: evaluating a statement's truth.
- We need the closest single-word synonym.
Concept / Approach:
“Confirmed” is the best match because it conveys establishing truth or validity, often by evidence. “Seconded” can mean endorsed (as in parliamentary procedure) but lacks the evidentiary implication. “Supported” is broader and weaker. “Disproved” is the antonym, and “condemned” means criticized, not verified.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Define corroborate: strengthen/confirm a statement by additional evidence.2) Choose “confirmed” to reflect evidentiary validation.3) Eliminate procedural or weaker agreement terms (seconded, supported).4) Exclude antonym (disproved) and irrelevant judgment (condemned).
Verification / Alternative check:
Substitute: “He confirmed the statement of his brother.” The legal-evidentiary flavor remains, proving equivalence.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
seconded: Formal endorsement without proof.supported: Generic backing; may be opinion, not evidence.disproved: Opposite meaning.condemned: Negative judgment; not verification.
Common Pitfalls:
Equating agreement with verification. Corroboration requires independent support that raises credibility, not just a vote of support.
Final Answer:
confirmed
Discussion & Comments