Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: disgraceful action
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
“Scandal” in public affairs refers to an event or decision that is morally or socially disgraceful, provoking outrage. The sentence frames a judicial outcome as a moral shock. This asks you to differentiate between mere talk and a substantive act that is disgraceful.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Among the choices, “disgraceful action” best matches the sense of “scandal” as a reprehensible occurrence. “Silly notion” trivializes the moral gravity. “Talk” or “rumour” point to conversation and hearsay, which are consequences of a scandal but not the scandal itself. The core meaning is about an act or situation that is shocking and shameful.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify semantic core: scandal = shocking, disgraceful event or action.2) Compare options: only “disgraceful action” names an event with moral censure.3) Substitute: “It is a disgraceful action that the murderer was declared innocent.” This keeps the evaluative force.4) Confirm register: both words are used in editorials and public commentary.
Verification / Alternative check:
Consider derivative forms: “scandalous decision” aligns directly with “disgraceful decision,” reinforcing the mapping.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
A) “silly notion” — minimizes seriousness; wrong dimension.B) “talk” — refers to public discussion, not the shocking event.C) “rumour” — unverified talk; not the scandal itself.E) Not necessary because D fits exactly.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing the scandal (event) with the buzz (gossip) that follows. The question targets the event’s disgrace, not the chatter.
Final Answer:
disgraceful action
Discussion & Comments