Introduction / Context:
In administrative and financial English, “remit fees” means to send or pay the fees. The sentence states that Manish “neglected to remit,” which implies he did not make the required payment on time, leading to a penalty. We must select the option that most accurately paraphrases this failure as used in routine notices and rules.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Target verb phrase: “remit (the fees).”
- Negated form: “neglected to remit” = did not send/pay.
- Outcome: fine imposed for non-payment by due date.
Concept / Approach:
Within the sentence, the essential meaning is “failed to pay/send.” Among the given choices, “failed” best captures neglect/non-compliance with a required action. “Refused” would imply deliberate defiance; “promised” is unrelated; “obstructed” suggests blocking another’s action; and a bare “send” is the positive action rather than its neglect. Thus, “failed” is the closest paraphrase in context.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Interpret “neglected to remit” as “did not pay/send.”2) Map this to a concise paraphrase: “failed (to do so).”3) Eliminate options with incorrect intent (refused) or unrelated meanings (promised, obstructed).4) Confirm that the fine logically follows a failure to remit.
Verification / Alternative check:
Rephrase: “Manish failed to pay the fees on time and therefore had to pay a fine.” This maintains the causal logic of the original sentence.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
refused: Implies willful defiance; not stated.promised: Future intent; irrelevant.obstructed: Action against a process; wrong subject/action.send: Opposite of what happened; he did not send/pay.
Common Pitfalls:
Misreading “remit” as “forgive” (another sense) or overlooking the negation “neglected to.” In fee/payment contexts, “remit” = send/pay money.
Final Answer:
failed
Discussion & Comments