Full-adder sum implementation using XOR gates: In a standard 1-bit full adder, the SUM output (S) can be realized using two exclusive-OR (XOR) gates arranged so that S = A XOR B XOR Cin. Assess this claim.
-
ACorrect
-
BIncorrect
-
COnly correct for carry-lookahead adders
-
DRequires three XOR gates, not two
Answer
Correct Answer: Correct
Explanation
Introduction / Context: The full adder is a fundamental combinational block that sums two bits and an incoming carry. Its outputs are SUM (S) and CARRY OUT (Cout). Understanding minimal gate implementations of S helps in efficient hardware design and HDL coding.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Inputs: A, B, Cin.
- Outputs: S = A XOR B XOR Cin, and Cout = majority(A, B, Cin) = A*B + B*Cin + A*Cin.
- Exclusive-OR gate property: X XOR Y = (X and not Y) + (not X and Y).
Concept / Approach: The XOR function is the natural expression of bitwise addition without carry. For two inputs, S2 = A XOR B. Adding Cin requires XORing that intermediate sum with Cin: S = (A XOR B) XOR Cin. This can be implemented with exactly two XOR gates in cascade.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Compute partial sum: P = A XOR B using one XOR gate.Compute final sum: S = P XOR Cin using a second XOR gate.No additional gates are required for S; Cout is implemented separately.Therefore, two XORs suffice for the SUM path in a full adder.Verification / Alternative check: Build the truth table for A, B, Cin and compute S via XOR chaining. The resulting S matches binary addition modulo 2, confirming the implementation.
Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Incorrect” ignores the standard identity. “Only correct for carry-lookahead adders” is irrelevant; the SUM path is the same across architectures. “Requires three XOR gates” overcounts the needed logic.
Common Pitfalls: Mixing SUM and CARRY logic; assuming Cout also needs XOR chaining rather than majority logic; forgetting XOR associativity (A XOR B XOR Cin is well defined).
Final Answer: Correct