K-map yields a minimized Boolean equation: A correctly completed Karnaugh map (K-map) always allows derivation of a simplified Boolean equation by grouping adjacent cells in powers of two and eliminating changing variables. Judge this general statement.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Correct

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
K-maps provide a graphical method for simplifying Boolean expressions. They help designers reduce logic by combining adjacent minterms (for SOP) or maxterms (for POS) into larger implicants, directly producing a minimized or near-minimized Boolean equation.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Proper K-map layout using Gray coding for variable ordering.
  • Valid entries: 1s (minterms), 0s, and optional don’t-care (X) cells.
  • Grouping rules: rectangles of size 1, 2, 4, 8, ... with wrap-around adjacency.


Concept / Approach:
By grouping adjacent 1s for SOP (or 0s for POS), variables that change within the group are eliminated from the product (or sum) term, yielding simpler expressions. Don’t-care cells can be used to enlarge groups, further simplifying the final equation.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Map the truth table onto the K-map cells according to Gray code.Form the largest valid groups that cover all 1s (SOP) or all 0s (POS).Translate each group into a term by keeping only variables that do not change across the group.Sum (OR) the product terms (for SOP) or multiply (AND) the sum terms (for POS) to form the simplified equation.


Verification / Alternative check:
Compare the derived equation against algebraic simplification or Quine–McCluskey results for the same function. The K-map approach should match or closely approximate the minimum form.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
It is not limited to three variables; 2–6 variable maps are standard. The presence or absence of don’t-cares does not prevent simplification; it often helps.



Common Pitfalls:
Making non-rectangular groups, ignoring wrap-around adjacency, or using non-power-of-two group sizes.



Final Answer:
Correct

More Questions from Combinational Logic Circuits

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion