Statement: Despite child-labour laws, children are still frequently seen working in hotels, shops, and houses.\nCourses of Action:\nI. The Government should not make laws that cannot be enforced.\nII. Build out a proper primary-education system and support mechanisms—particularly targeting marginalized communities—to eradicate the problem at its roots.

Introduction / Context:
Even with laws, child labour persists due to poverty, demand for cheap labour, and gaps in enforcement and schooling. Courses of action must be constructive and feasible, not cynical rejections of legislation.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Child labour continues “very frequently.”
• Existing child-labour laws are in place.

Concept / Approach:
Course I undermines the rule of law and is not a solution; improving enforceability (inspections, penalties, rehabilitation) is preferable to abandoning statutes. Course II addresses root causes—access to quality primary education, midday meals, stipends, and social protection—reducing the economic push factors.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Reject I: the remedy is better enforcement and support, not scrapping laws.2) Accept II: education plus targeted support reduces child labour sustainably.3) Therefore, only II follows.

Verification / Alternative check:
Successful anti-child-labour programs combine enforcement with schooling incentives and community engagement.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I is non-actionable and counterproductive; “Either/Both” wrongly elevate it.

Common Pitfalls:
Claiming unenforceability instead of strengthening institutions; overlooking socio-economic drivers.

Final Answer:
Only II follows.