Fermi–Dirac statistics at the Fermi level For an electron energy level exactly equal to the Fermi level EF, what is the Fermi–Dirac occupation probability f(EF) at thermal equilibrium?

Electronics and Communication Engineering Materials and Components Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    0
  • B
    0.25
  • C
    0.5
  • D
    1
  • E
    Depends on temperature, not fixed

Answer

Correct Answer: 0.5

Explanation

Introduction / Context:Fermi–Dirac statistics govern the occupancy of electron energy states in metals and semiconductors. The Fermi level EF is a key reference energy at which the probability of occupation yields an elegant and temperature-independent result. This concept underpins carrier distributions, density-of-states calculations, and device physics.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Thermal equilibrium and non-degenerate statistics are not assumed; the exact Fermi–Dirac form is used.
  • We evaluate the probability precisely at E = EF.
  • Temperature T can be any non-negative absolute temperature.

Concept / Approach:

The Fermi–Dirac distribution is f(E) = 1 / (1 + exp[(E − EF) / (kT)]). At E = EF, the exponential term becomes exp(0) = 1, hence f(EF) = 1 / (1 + 1) = 1/2. This holds at all temperatures, including T = 0 K and T > 0 K, making 0.5 a universal result at the Fermi level in equilibrium.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Write Fermi–Dirac distribution: f(E) = 1 / (1 + exp[(E − EF)/kT]).Substitute E = EF → exponent = 0.Compute f(EF): 1 / (1 + 1) = 0.5.

Verification / Alternative check:

At T = 0 K, all states below EF are filled and above EF are empty; the limiting value at EF is 0.5 by convention. At finite T, thermal smearing occurs, but the symmetry about EF keeps f(EF) = 0.5.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

0 or 1 correspond to energies far from EF at T = 0 K; 0.25 is not supported by the Fermi–Dirac formula at E = EF; “Depends on temperature” is incorrect because the value remains 0.5 for any T in equilibrium.

Common Pitfalls:

Confusing f(EF) with the average occupancy near EF where temperature does influence the slope but not the exact mid-point probability at E = EF.

Final Answer:

0.5

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion